😂The hosts engage in humorous banter and share their thoughts on hypothetical scenarios.
🤔They analyze each other's personalities and provide interesting insights based on their individual traits.
💡The hosts reveal their true selves and showcase their unique perspectives on various topics.
🍔They discuss food preferences and share funny anecdotes about restaurant experiences.
🔍The hosts delve into the world of crime and investigations, contemplating who would make the best criminal or detective.
Who is most likely to get away with murder?
—The hosts discuss their individual traits and G emerges as the most likely candidate due to his cool and calm demeanor.
Who is most likely to return a dish at a restaurant?
—While all hosts deny being the one to return a dish, G is identified as the most particular when it comes to his food preferences.
Who would win in an interrogation?
—Joey expresses his lack of skill in handling interrogations, while Garnt's extensive knowledge of true crime cases gives him an advantage.
Do any of the hosts have criminal tendencies?
—The hosts dismiss any inclination towards criminal activities and emphasize that their discussions are purely hypothetical and for entertainment purposes.
What other funny scenarios do they discuss?
—Apart from murder and returning dishes, the hosts also engage in humorous conversations about bank robberies and their manly urges.
02:59The hosts introduce the episode's theme and discuss a game they played called 'Drunk, Stoned, Stupid'.
06:00They play a game where they debate and argue over various statements about each other.
10:30The hosts discuss who among them is most likely to return a dish at a restaurant.
17:00They delve into an intriguing conversation about who would win in an interrogation.
22:00The hosts contemplate who is most likely to commit a crime, specifically murder.
27:00They explore the topic of bank robberies and their manly urges.
35:00The hosts discuss their individual food preferences and share funny anecdotes about restaurant experiences.
45:00They conclude the episode by reassuring listeners that their discussions about crime are purely hypothetical and for entertainment purposes.
