🔍The expert witness's opinions were misrepresented in the official designation.
🤔The witness had not formed any opinions at the time the official designation was served.
🔎The witness has never arrived at the opinion that the allegations of abuse are false.
📝The witness's opinions are presented in their report and the testimony given.
💡The discrepancies raise concerns about the accuracy and integrity of the expert witness testimony.
Was the witness's opinion misrepresented in the official designation?
—Yes, the official designation contained opinions that were not held by the witness.
Did the witness have any opinions at the time the official designation was served?
—No, the witness had not formed any opinions at that time.
Has the witness arrived at the opinion that the allegations of abuse are false?
—No, the witness has never held the opinion that the allegations are false.
Where can the witness's opinions be found?
—The witness's opinions are presented in their report and the testimony given.
What are the implications of the discrepancies in the expert witness testimony?
—The discrepancies raise concerns about the accuracy and integrity of the expert witness testimony.
01:12The expert witness's opinions were misrepresented in the official designation.
08:51The witness had not formed any opinions at the time the official designation was served.
10:42The witness has never arrived at the opinion that the allegations of abuse are false.
12:13The witness's opinions are presented in their report and the testimony given.
14:07The discrepancies raise concerns about the accuracy and integrity of the expert witness testimony.
