😱Plaintiff's car was towed without a ticket and held for ransom by the defendant.
🚔The police had no record of the car being towed and a stolen vehicle report was filed.
🔄Defendant crossed out the ticket number on their tow sheet and couldn't explain why.
🔍Plaintiff discovered a former employee of the tow company was involved in towing his car.
💸Judge rules in favor of the plaintiff and orders a refund of $273.26.
Why was the plaintiff's car towed?
—The car was towed without a ticket, causing it to be reported stolen.
Did the defendant have a valid reason to tow the car?
—No, the defendant crossed out the ticket number and couldn't provide an explanation.
What actions did the plaintiff take to locate his car?
—The plaintiff called 311 and the local precinct, but there was no record of the car being towed.
Who was responsible for towing the car?
—A former employee of the tow company, who was present during the trial, admitted to towing the car.
What was the outcome of the case?
—The judge ruled in favor of the plaintiff and ordered a refund of $273.26.
00:00Plaintiff's car is reported stolen after being towed without a ticket by the defendant.
06:48The plaintiff confronts the defendant about the missing ticket and the defendant can't provide an explanation.
10:10The plaintiff presents audio evidence of his conversation with the towing company, proving their involvement.
11:45The judge determines that the car was towed illegally and orders a refund for the plaintiff.
