The Truth Behind Bite Marks - Exposing the Flaws of Forensic Science

🔍Bite mark analysis has been a widely used method in forensic science, often considered as reliable evidence in criminal trials.

❌DNA analysis has exposed the flaws of bite mark analysis, leading to wrongful convictions in many cases.

🧪Keith Harward's case highlights the need for reform in forensic science and the reliance on more reliable methods like DNA analysis.

⚖️The wrongful conviction of Keith Harward raises questions about the credibility of forensic experts and the justice system.

🆓DNA analysis not only exonerated Keith Harward but also identified the real perpetrator of the crime, Jerry Cate.

How long did Keith Harward spend in prison?

—Keith Harward spent 33 years in prison for a crime he didn't commit.

What exposed the flaws of bite mark analysis?

—DNA analysis exposed the flaws of bite mark analysis, revealing its unreliable nature.

What does Keith Harward's case highlight?

—Keith Harward's case highlights the need for reform in forensic science and raises questions about the credibility of forensic experts and the justice system.

Who was the real perpetrator in Keith Harward's case?

—The real perpetrator in Keith Harward's case was Jerry Cate, who was identified through DNA analysis.

What is the significance of Keith Harward's exoneration?

—Keith Harward's exoneration not only freed an innocent man but also exposed the flaws in bite mark analysis and highlighted the importance of relying on more reliable methods like DNA analysis.

00:00Introduction and background of bite mark analysis in forensic science.

06:37Explanation of Keith Harward's case and his wrongful conviction.

14:28Discovery of potentially exonerating evidence and reevaluation of the case.

16:16Exoneration of Keith Harward and identification of the real perpetrator.