📜The defense argues that the defendant's Miranda rights were violated
🔒The prosecution presents evidence that the defendant understood his rights
📹Body-worn cameras and interview room recordings will be reviewed
🧐The court will examine the totality of the circumstances to determine the validity of the defendant's statements
⚖️The prosecution must prove that the defendant's statements were voluntary
What is the motion to suppress and eliminate?
—The motion to suppress and eliminate focuses on excluding evidence obtained through a violation of the defendant's constitutional rights.
What is the defense arguing?
—The defense argues that the defendant's Miranda rights were violated and that his statements were not made voluntarily.
What evidence does the prosecution present?
—The prosecution presents evidence showing that the defendant understood his rights and spoke with the police willingly.
What will the court review?
—The court will review body-worn camera footage and interview room recordings to examine the totality of the circumstances.
What does the prosecution need to prove?
—The prosecution must prove that the defendant's statements were voluntary.
00:29Introduction to the case of State vs Chad Norman
00:51Overview of the motion to suppress and eliminate
00:57Presence of Mr. Norman and legal representation
01:07Representation of the state and defense
01:14Brief discussion about a Chambers conversation
01:19Introduction to the motion to suppress and eliminate
01:20Key issues addressed in the motion
01:22Arguments regarding the defendant's Miranda rights
