🔍The 5th person in the house, initially thought to be the last to see the victims alive, now denies this claim.
😲Contradictory statements from the lawyer representing the man who lived in the house raise suspicions.
🤔The timeline of events becomes foggy as different versions of the story emerge.
💔The families of the victims express their frustration and plea for answers.
❓The 5th person's attorney reveals inconsistencies in communication, adding to the mystery.
Was the 5th person the last to see the victims alive?
—Initially, it was claimed that the 5th person was the last to see the victims alive, but this claim has been refuted.
Who is disputing the account of events?
—The lawyer representing the man who lived in the house is disputing the account of events.
What inconsistencies have arisen?
—There are inconsistencies in statements regarding the presence of the 5th person and the timeline of events.
How do the families of the victims feel?
—The families express frustration and a strong desire for answers.
What communication inconsistencies have been revealed?
—There are inconsistencies between claims of communication through text messages and Facebook messages.
00:02Introduction to the perplexing case of the Northland murders.
00:09The discovery of three bodies in a backyard and the initial investigation.
01:01Contradictions in statements made by the man who lived in the house.
01:46The evolving story and changing claims regarding the presence of the 5th person.
02:53The families' frustration and plea for answers.
