The Invincibles vs. Modern Teams: Are They Overrated?

TLDRThe debate on whether the Invincibles are overrated or not continues. Some argue that other teams, like Chelsea and Manchester City, have achieved more. However, the Invincibles' unbeaten run is a remarkable achievement. They should have won more trophies, but their lack of success in Europe hindered their legacy.

Key insights

🏆The Invincibles' unbeaten season is a remarkable achievement.

🥇Other teams, like Chelsea and Manchester City, have achieved more success in terms of trophies.

🏆The Invincibles should have won more trophies, particularly in Europe.

Harry Kane is compared to Thierry Henry in terms of their all-around abilities as strikers.

💰The Super League was driven by money and the desire to franchise European football.

Q&A

Are the Invincibles overrated?

The debate is subjective, but their unbeaten season is a remarkable achievement.

Is Harry Kane a better striker than Thierry Henry?

It's a matter of opinion, but Kane is compared to Henry in terms of their all-around abilities as strikers.

Why did Tottenham not deserve a place in the Super League?

The Super League was driven by money, and Tottenham's inclusion was primarily based on their revenue and stadium.

Did the Super League deserve the backlash?

Yes, the Super League faced backlash due to its focus on money and disregard for the traditional football pyramid.

Did the Invincibles deserve more success?

The Invincibles should have won more trophies, especially in Europe, to solidify their legacy.

Timestamped Summary

00:00The debate on whether the Invincibles are overrated or not continues.

10:08Harry Kane is compared to Thierry Henry in terms of their all-around abilities as strikers.

10:28The Super League was driven by money and the desire to franchise European football.