The Ingraham Angle: Trump's Victory Against Legal Forces

TLDRNew York appellate court reduces Judge Engoron's obscene amount on appeal. Left disappointed. Trump avoids personal asset seizure. Leading legal minds insist ends justify means. Trump's case disproportional from outset. Democrats resort to lawfare and fear-mongering. Joe can't be trusted to defend border or chaos abroad. Surrogates and corporate media justify bending legal system against Trump.

Key insights

🚨New York appellate court slashes Judge Engoron's obscene amount on appeal.

💰The left's fantasy of seizing Trump's assets is disappointed.

⚖️Leading legal minds believe the ends justify the means.

🎭Democrats resort to lawfare and fear-mongering against Trump.

🤝Surrogates and corporate media defend bending the legal system against Trump.

Q&A

What was the New York appellate court's decision?

The New York appellate court reduced Judge Engoron's obscene amount on appeal from 454 million to 175 million.

What was the left's long-time fantasy?

The left wanted to see New York A.G. Letitia James personally seize Trump's assets.

What do leading legal minds believe?

Leading legal minds believe that the ends justify the means in Trump's case.

What tactics do Democrats resort to?

Democrats resort to lawfare and fear-mongering against Trump.

Who defends bending the legal system against Trump?

Surrogates and corporate media defend bending the legal system against Trump.

Timestamped Summary

00:08New York appellate court reduces Judge Engoron's obscene amount on appeal.

00:24The left's long-time fantasy of seizing Trump's assets is disappointed.

02:27Leading legal minds believe the ends justify the means in Trump's case.

03:48Democrats resort to lawfare and fear-mongering against Trump.

05:20Surrogates and corporate media defend bending the legal system against Trump.