The Incompetent Judge: A $175 Million Trial

TLDRIn a $175 million trial, an incompetent judge demonstrates a lack of understanding and knowledge about the case, resulting in unjust charges against the defendant. The judge's ignorance of collateral security, cash investments, and bonding companies reveals a flawed justice system.

Key insights

🔍The judge lacks knowledge about collateral security, cash investments, and bonding companies, leading to unjust charges.

🏛️The trial should have been handled by the business division, where complex business trials are usually conducted.

🌉The judge's lack of understanding and incorrect valuation of assets undermines a fair and accurate narrative.

🏢Businesses are avoiding New York due to the risk of facing incompetent judges and unjust charges.

💼The defendant's investment of $175 million and approval by the attorney general verifies the credibility of the deal.

Q&A

What were the judge's misconceptions about collateral security?

The judge had no understanding of collateral security and questioned its reliability, despite the defendant's significant cash investment and the presence of a credible bonding company.

Why should the trial have been conducted in the business division?

Given the complexity of the case involving collateral security and cash investments, the trial should have been handled by the business division to ensure a fair and knowledgeable analysis.

How did the incorrect valuation of assets impact the narrative?

By undervaluing the defendant's assets, the judge created a false narrative that undermined the defendant's credibility and portrayed an inaccurate picture of the situation.

Why are businesses moving out of New York?

Businesses are increasingly leaving New York due to the risk of encountering incompetent judges and facing unjust charges, which negatively impact their operations and overall business environment.

Was the defendant's investment approved by the attorney general?

Yes, the defendant's investment of $175 million was approved by the attorney general, indicating the legitimacy and credibility of the deal.

Timestamped Summary

00:04The judge lacked knowledge about collateral security, cash investments, and bonding companies.

00:28The trial should have been handled by the business division, which specializes in complex business trials.

01:05The judge's incorrect valuation of assets created a false narrative that undermined the defendant's credibility.

01:52Businesses are moving out of New York to avoid encountering incompetent judges and unjust charges.

02:26The defendant's investment of $175 million was approved by the attorney general, verifying its credibility.