The Impact of Anti-Intellectualism on American Politics

🔑The Senate hearing with nominee Colleen Shogin revealed a debate on the topic of anti-intellectualism in politics.

🧠Shogin clarifies that her article focused on the rhetorical strategies of presidents and not an evaluation of voter intelligence.

🤝The questioning emphasizes the importance of non-partisanship and neutrality in the role of archivist.

🗒️The article in question explores the connection between presidents' rhetorical styles and their popularity with the American people.

🇺🇸The discussion raises concerns about the politicization of institutions such as the National Archives and the Department of Justice.

What is the focus of the Senate hearing with nominee Colleen Shogin?

—The hearing focuses on the topic of anti-intellectualism in politics and its implications.

What did Shogin clarify about her article on anti-intellectualism?

—Shogin explains that her article examined the rhetorical strategies of past presidents, rather than making judgments about voter intelligence.

What does the questioning highlight regarding leadership roles?

—The questioning underscores the importance of non-partisanship and neutrality in leadership roles, such as that of an archivist.

What does the article in question explore?

—The article explores the connection between presidents' rhetorical styles and their popularity with the American people.

What concerns does the discussion raise?

—The discussion raises concerns about the politicization of institutions like the National Archives and the Department of Justice.

00:00During a Senate hearing, Senator Josh Hawley questions nominee Colleen Shogin about her views on anti-intellectualism.

02:13Hawley brings up an article written by Shogin titled 'Anti-Intellectualism in the Modern Presidency' and asks her about the term 'anti-intellectualism'.

03:38Shogin clarifies that her article focused on the rhetorical strategies of presidents, not an evaluation of voter intelligence.

06:06Hawley accuses Shogin of presenting the view that 'Republicans are stupid and Democrats are intellectual'. Shogin denies this, stating that her article analyzes rhetorical connections between presidents and the American people.

07:19Hawley expresses concern about the politicization of institutions like the National Archives and the Department of Justice, emphasizing the need for non-partisanship in leadership roles.