The Hobbit Trilogy - A Shameless Cash Grab

TLDRThe Hobbit trilogy, owned by Warner Brothers, tries to recapture the magic of The Lord of the Rings but falls short. The movies stretch a single book into three, resulting in a bloated and unnecessary narrative. The CGI-heavy effects and lack of practical assets diminish the quality compared to the original trilogy. While the first movie has its moments, the subsequent movies suffer from the addition of unnecessary and made-up content. The dwarves' characters are underdeveloped and their distinct fighting style is not utilized effectively. Overall, The Hobbit trilogy is a disappointing and shameless cash grab.

Key insights

🧙‍♂️The portrayal of Bilbo Baggins by Martin Freeman is one of the strongest aspects of the trilogy. His character captures the essence of the adventurous hobbit.

👥The 13 dwarves accompanying Bilbo on his quest lack development and their characters are forgettable. Their distinct fighting style is not utilized effectively.

💰The trilogy is a shameless cash grab by Warner Brothers, stretching a single book into three movies and adding unnecessary and made-up content.

🎶While some of the original soundtrack is reused in the trilogy, the few new compositions, such as the dwarf theme, are a highlight.

🎥The excessive use of CGI and lack of practical assets diminish the quality of the visual effects. The green screen usage is noticeable and the face filter on returning actors is distracting.

Q&A

Why are there three movies for a single book?

Warner Brothers wanted to recapture the magic of The Lord of the Rings trilogy and stretched The Hobbit, a single book, into three movies to maximize profits.

Are there any memorable characters in the trilogy?

The portrayal of Bilbo Baggins by Martin Freeman is one of the strongest aspects of the trilogy. However, the dwarf characters lack development and are forgettable.

Is the trilogy worth watching?

While the first movie has its moments, the subsequent movies suffer from unnecessary and made-up content. The overall quality of the trilogy falls short compared to The Lord of the Rings.

Are the visual effects impressive?

The excessive use of CGI and lack of practical assets diminish the quality of the visual effects. The green screen usage is noticeable, and the face filters on returning actors are distracting.

Is the soundtrack as memorable as the original trilogy?

While some of the original soundtrack is reused in the trilogy, the few new compositions, such as the dwarf theme, are a highlight. However, there aren't many new compositions overall.

Timestamped Summary

00:00The Hobbit trilogy, owned by Warner Brothers, tries to recapture the magic of The Lord of the Rings but falls short.

05:38The portrayal of Bilbo Baggins by Martin Freeman is one of the strongest aspects of the trilogy.

07:55The 13 dwarves accompanying Bilbo on his quest lack development and their characters are forgettable.

09:40The trilogy is a shameless cash grab, stretching a single book into three movies and adding unnecessary and made-up content.

10:59While some of the original soundtrack is reused, the few new compositions, such as the dwarf theme, are a highlight.

08:55The excessive use of CGI and lack of practical assets diminish the quality of the visual effects.