The Evolution of _JavaScript: From Advocate to Dissenter

TLDRJavaScript, once a language I championed, now disappoints me. Despite its dominance in its field, its inherent flaws make it unsatisfactory. We should embrace the next generation of languages and move away from JavaScript's limitations.

Key insights

🔄JavaScript has evolved from being highly regarded to being criticized for its flaws and limitations.

💩JavaScript is considered a 'smelly' language with many congenital defects and unnecessary complexity.

⏮️We should be moving towards the next generation of languages to overcome the limitations of JavaScript.

🎛️The web and operating systems have accumulated a plethora of mistakes and unnecessary features, hindering progress and clean development.

🔜It is time for a new programming language that is cleaner, more reliable, and can address the shortcomings of JavaScript.

Q&A

Why did you advocate for JavaScript in the past?

I believed that JavaScript had the potential to change the world and enable amazing things when used properly.

What are the major flaws of JavaScript?

JavaScript is considered a 'smelly' language with many congenital defects and unnecessary complexity that hinder its usability and maintainability.

What is the next generation of languages?

The next generation of languages refers to newer programming languages that aim to address the limitations and flaws of existing languages like JavaScript.

Why do you believe the web and operating systems cannot progress?

The web and operating systems have accumulated mistakes and unnecessary features, making it difficult to introduce new clean and reliable systems.

Why is it important to move away from JavaScript?

Moving away from JavaScript is crucial to embrace cleaner, more reliable languages that can overcome its limitations and provide better development experiences.

Timestamped Summary

00:0020 years ago, I started advocating for JavaScript, believing it to be a powerful language that could change the world.

00:22However, I now believe that we should stop using JavaScript due to its numerous congenital defects and unnecessary complexity.

01:12The web and operating systems have accumulated mistakes and unnecessary features, impairing progress and innovation.

01:36We need a new generation of cleaner languages and runtimes to address the limitations of JavaScript.

01:58Moving away from JavaScript should be seen as a normal evolution, rather than a radical viewpoint.