The Cross-Examination That Brought Jessica Groves to Tears

💔Jessica Groves broke down and refused to answer questions during cross-examination.

💡The defense strategy to only have Groves exonerate her husband without providing details compromised her credibility.

💉The prosecution's aim was to get Groves to admit her guilt and reveal how she caused her child's injuries.

🔒The judge warned Groves that her refusal to cooperate may result in striking her testimony from consideration.

🛑The trial recessed to allow Groves' attorney to discuss the consequences of her actions.

Why did Jessica Groves refuse to answer specific questions during cross-examination?

—Groves broke down and refused to answer because she did not want to provide details of how she caused her child's injuries.

What was the impact of Groves' lack of cooperation during cross-examination?

—By not answering specific questions, Groves undermined her credibility and weakened her defense.

What did the judge warn Groves about her refusal to cooperate?

—The judge warned Groves that if she continues to refuse to cooperate, her testimony may be struck from consideration.

What was the prosecution trying to accomplish during cross-examination?

—The prosecution aimed to get Groves to admit her guilt and reveal how she caused her child's injuries.

What happened after Groves refused to answer questions during cross-examination?

—The trial recessed to allow Groves' attorney to discuss the consequences of her actions.

10:02During cross-examination, Jessica Groves broke down and refused to answer specific questions about how she caused her child's injuries.

11:41The judge warned Groves that her refusal to answer may result in striking her testimony.

12:33The trial recessed to allow Groves' attorney to discuss the consequences of her actions.