The CRA's Decision on Bear Trust Reporting Requirements Backfires, Leaving Canadians Frustrated

TLDRThe CRA's decision to remove bear trust tax reporting requirements has resulted in Canadians losing hundreds of dollars in tax preparation fees. Many feel that the CRA is making their lives harder by announcing rule changes at the last minute. Bear trusts, such as joint bank accounts and co-sign mortgages, are popular arrangements that many Canadians are unaware of. The confusion surrounding the new reporting rules has caused accountants and accounting firms to spend hours researching and discussing filing requirements with clients. Accountants handling these trusts may not get paid for their work, and the CRA is unlikely to provide compensation.

Key insights

👥The CRA's decision to remove bear trust tax reporting requirements has resulted in financial harm to Canadians.

💼Many Canadians are unaware that their joint bank accounts and co-sign mortgages are considered bear trusts.

⏰The CRA's last-minute announcement of the rule change has caused confusion and frustration.

💸Accountants and accounting firms have had to spend significant time and resources to understand and explain the new reporting requirements.

🗣️The CRA should have anticipated the negative consequences of their decision on taxpayers and accountants.

Q&A

What are bear trusts?

—Bear trusts are arrangements such as joint bank accounts and co-sign mortgages that require tax reporting.

Why are Canadians losing money in tax preparation fees?

—Canadians are losing money in tax preparation fees because they have to spend additional time and resources to comply with the new reporting requirements.

Is the CRA compensating accountants for their work on bear trusts?

—The CRA is unlikely to provide compensation for accountants who have worked on bear trusts.

Why did the CRA announce the rule change at the last minute?

—The CRA's decision to announce the rule change at the last minute has caused confusion and frustration among taxpayers and accountants.

What should the CRA have done differently?

—The CRA should have anticipated the negative consequences of their decision and taken steps to mitigate them, such as providing clearer guidance and allowing more time for compliance.

Timestamped Summary

00:00The CRA's decision to remove bear trust tax reporting requirements has led to financial harm for Canadians.

00:40Bear trusts, such as joint bank accounts and co-sign mortgages, are popular arrangements that many Canadians are unaware of.

01:03The CRA's last-minute announcement of the rule change has caused confusion and frustration.

01:17Accountants and accounting firms have spent significant time and resources to understand and explain the new reporting requirements.

01:50The CRA should have anticipated the negative consequences of their decision on taxpayers and accountants.

Browse more