🚗Tammy trusted Jose to order and deliver the rims, but he failed to do so.
📝Jose's claim of cancellation fee and restocking fee was refuted by the lack of evidence.
💔The relationship between Tammy and Jose deteriorated due to the dispute over the rims.
💰The judge ruled in favor of Tammy, ordering Jose to pay back the $580 plus court costs.
👨⚖️The case emphasizes the importance of honesty and trust in business transactions.
Why did Tammy sue Jose?
—Tammy sued Jose because he failed to deliver the rims she paid for.
What evidence did Tammy present?
—Tammy presented text conversations and testimonies from the Bridgewater police officer and the owner of the store where she allegedly ordered the rims.
What was Jose's defense?
—Jose claimed that Tammy canceled the rim order, but he failed to provide any evidence to support his claim.
What was the judge's ruling?
—The judge ruled in favor of Tammy, ordering Jose to pay back the $580 she paid for the rims plus court costs.
What lesson can be learned from this case?
—This case highlights the importance of honesty and trust in business transactions and serves as a reminder to always have proper documentation and evidence.
00:00Tammy sues Jose for failing to deliver the rims she paid for.
03:30Tammy presents evidence including text conversations and testimonies.
06:45Jose claims that Tammy canceled the rim order, but fails to provide evidence.
08:30The judge rules in favor of Tammy, ordering Jose to pay her back.
