⚖️Janice accuses Albert of selling her a car with a transmission warranty and failing to repair it when it broke down.
📜Albert denies the warranty claim and presents a forged document as proof.
🔍The judge questions Janice's decision to buy a 15-year-old car without a mechanic inspection.
🤝Janice and Albert both present conflicting testimonies about the car's condition and maintenance.
💔Janice's claim for lost wages is dismissed as it is unrelated to the car's warranty dispute.
Did Janice have the car inspected by a mechanic before buying it?
—No, Janice did not have the car inspected before buying it.
What evidence did Janice provide to support her warranty claim?
—Janice provided a document she claims to be a warranty signed by Albert, but he denies ever signing it.
Did Janice prove that the car's transmission issues were covered under the warranty?
—No, Janice failed to provide sufficient evidence that the warranty covered the transmission issues.
Who ruled in favor of Albert, and why?
—The judge ruled in favor of Albert as Janice failed to prove her case and provide convincing evidence of a valid warranty.
Did Janice receive any compensation for her lost wages?
—No, Janice's claim for lost wages was dismissed as it was unrelated to the warranty dispute.
00:02Janice accuses Albert of selling her a car with a transmission warranty and failing to repair it when it broke down.
08:00Albert presents a forged document as proof that he did not provide a warranty for the car.
10:00Janice admits she did not have the car inspected by a mechanic before buying it.
11:00Janice and Albert present conflicting testimonies about the car's condition and maintenance.
25:00The judge dismisses Janice's claim for lost wages as it is unrelated to the warranty dispute.
