The Bold Move: Should the Cowboys Let Dak Prescott Play Out His Contract?

🤔Letting Dak Prescott play out his contract would be a bold move and could set a precedent in the NFL.

💰Signing Dak Prescott to a long-term deal could secure the Cowboys' quarterback position and provide stability.

🏆Winning a Super Bowl without an elite quarterback is possible with the right supporting cast.

⏳Waiting to sign Dak Prescott may lead to increased contract demands if he has a successful season.

🔍The Cowboys would need to have a backup plan in case Dak Prescott decides to leave in free agency.

What are the risks of letting Dak Prescott play out his contract?

—The risk is that he could have a breakout season and demand a higher salary in free agency.

What are the benefits of signing Dak Prescott to a long-term deal?

—Signing him to a long-term deal would provide stability at the quarterback position and potentially secure a franchise quarterback.

Can the Cowboys win a Super Bowl without an elite quarterback?

—Yes, with the right supporting cast and a strong defense, a team can win a Super Bowl without an elite quarterback.

What happens if Dak Prescott leaves in free agency?

—The Cowboys would need to have a backup plan in place to fill the starting quarterback position.

What factors should the Cowboys consider in making this decision?

—The team should consider Dak Prescott's performance, salary demands, and their overall long-term vision for the franchise.

01:27Jerry Jones expresses interest in extending Dak Prescott's contract.

03:45Discussing the potential risks and benefits of letting Dak Prescott play out his contract.

06:45Examining the financial implications of signing Dak Prescott to a long-term deal.

09:59Analyzing the possibility of the Cowboys winning a Super Bowl without an elite quarterback.

12:50Reflecting on the impact of losing cornerback L'Jarius Sneed to the Tennessee Titans.