🔍The Benghazi attack was a planned terrorist attack, not a spontaneous response to a video.
📜The Obama administration used the video narrative to downplay its foreign policy failures.
🔐The State Department had evidence of a terrorist attack but chose to mislead the American people.
💔Four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens, lost their lives in the Benghazi attack.
🔺The Benghazi attack revealed weaknesses in U.S. diplomatic security and intelligence gathering.
Was the Benghazi attack a result of a video protest?
—No, the attack was a planned terrorist attack.
Why did the Obama administration use the video narrative?
—The administration used the video narrative to downplay its foreign policy failures and shift blame.
Did the State Department have evidence of a terrorist attack?
—Yes, the State Department had evidence of a terrorist attack but chose to mislead the public.
How many Americans lost their lives in the Benghazi attack?
—Four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens, lost their lives.
What did the Benghazi attack reveal about U.S. diplomatic security?
—The attack revealed weaknesses in U.S. diplomatic security and intelligence gathering.
00:00The video narrative surrounding the Benghazi attack was used to downplay the failures of the Obama administration's foreign policy.
05:00The State Department had evidence of a terrorist attack but chose to mislead the American people by focusing on the video protest.
10:00Four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens, lost their lives in the Benghazi attack.
15:00The Benghazi attack revealed weaknesses in U.S. diplomatic security and intelligence gathering.
