💡Terraform provides consistency when defining state and managing infrastructure code.
🔑Pulumi offers flexibility but lacks consistency in state management.
🌐Terraform's HCL (HashiCorp Configuration Language) is limited and consistent across engagements.
🔒Pulumi is a SAS product that pushes state data to a remote network by default, which can pose security concerns.
🧩Terraform's state management is well-known and can be easily shared and understood among teams and organizations.
What is the main difference between Terraform and Pulumi?
—Terraform provides consistent state management and a wider adoption, while Pulumi offers flexibility but lacks consistency.
Is Pulumi a suitable choice for managing infrastructure code?
—Pulumi can be used to manage infrastructure code, but its flexibility may lead to challenges in maintaining consistency.
Why is Terraform recommended for defining state?
—Terraform's HCL provides a limited, but consistent way to define state, making it easier to share and understand across organizations.
Does Pulumi pose any security concerns?
—Yes, Pulumi is a SAS product that pushes state data to a remote network by default, which may raise security concerns.
Which tool is more commonly used among DevOps engineers?
—Terraform is more widely adopted among DevOps engineers due to its simplicity, stability, and availability of community resources.
00:03Introduction to the topic of Terraform vs Pulumi
00:09Terraform offers consistency in defining state, while Pulumi allows for greater flexibility
00:19Potential challenges of using Pulumi for state management
00:34Advantages of using Terraform's HCL for defining state
00:43Disadvantages of relying on Pulumi as a SAS product with potential security concerns
01:00Comparing the ease of use and adoption of Terraform vs Pulumi among organizations
02:01Reiteration that Terraform is the recommended tool for managing infrastructure code
03:40Additional insights and explanation of the limitations and benefits of Terraform and Pulumi
