Rethinking Tech Debt: Moving Beyond the Box

TLDRIn this talk, Emily Rosengren discusses the concept of tech debt and the need to reframe how we think about it. She argues that the traditional definition of tech debt holds us back and suggests a more holistic approach to improving our products. By moving beyond the box of technical improvements, we can better prioritize and communicate the importance of making necessary changes.

Key insights

💡Tech debt is a concept that needs to be reframed and redefined to reflect the current technology landscape.

📦The traditional definition of tech debt puts us in a box, limiting our focus to technical improvements rather than a holistic view of our products.

🔄We should move towards a more forward-looking concept that prioritizes the improvement of our products as a whole.

🌐As engineers, we should think beyond technical debt and consider the overall impact and value of our work.

🚀By reframing our approach to tech debt, we can better prioritize and communicate the importance of making necessary changes to improve our products.

Q&A

What is tech debt?

—Tech debt refers to the accumulated shortcuts and compromises made in software development that may hinder future development and maintenance.

Why is the traditional definition of tech debt limiting?

—The traditional definition focuses solely on technical improvements, neglecting the broader scope of product development and improvement.

What is a more holistic approach to improving products?

—A more holistic approach involves considering the overall impact and value of our work, beyond just technical debt.

How can we prioritize necessary changes?

—By reframing our approach to tech debt and considering the overall improvement of our products, we can better prioritize the necessary changes.

How can we communicate the importance of making changes to stakeholders?

—By clearly explaining the impact and value of the changes, we can effectively communicate the importance to stakeholders.

Timestamped Summary

00:00Emily Rosengren challenges the traditional definition of tech debt and proposes a more holistic approach.

06:40The concept of tech debt originated from the need to explain the importance of making changes to software systems.

11:30The concept of tech debt has evolved over time, but it may no longer fully capture the complexity of modern software development.

17:20By considering the overall impact and value of our work, we can prioritize improvements beyond just technical debt.

22:55Reframing our approach to tech debt can help us better communicate the importance of necessary changes to stakeholders.

Browse more