🔍The prosecution focuses on the illegal nature of the hush money payment and links it to Donald Trump's personal gain.
🔒The defense aims to discredit witness Michael Cohen and questions the financial motivations behind the payment.
🗞️Ex-National Enquirer publisher David Pecker's testimony potentially reveals insights into the case.
What is the main argument of the prosecution?
—The prosecution argues that the hush money payment was illegal and was intended for Donald Trump's personal gain.
How does the defense try to undermine the importance of the payment?
—The defense questions the credibility of witness Michael Cohen and argues that the payment was driven by financial motivations rather than illegal intent.
What role does David Pecker play in the trial?
—David Pecker, the ex-National Enquirer publisher, testifies and may provide valuable insights into the case.
00:14The prosecution's opening statement highlights the illegal nature of the payment and Donald Trump's intent to use it for personal gain.
01:08The defense's opening statement aims to discredit witness Michael Cohen and questions the financial motivations behind the payment.
03:11Ex-National Enquirer publisher David Pecker testifies, potentially revealing valuable insights into the case.
