🔍TensorFlow offers both high and low-level APIs, providing flexibility and control over the implementation. Keras, as a high-level API, simplifies the implementation process and is more user-friendly. PyTorch is a low-level API with a complex architecture, suitable for research purposes.
⏩TensorFlow is faster than Keras due to lower overhead. Keras, however, provides a higher level of abstraction, making it easier to learn and implement. PyTorch has comparable speed to TensorFlow, but lower GPU utilization.
🏗️TensorFlow has a more complex architecture, which can be challenging to navigate. Keras offers a simpler architecture and is easier to use. PyTorch has a complex architecture but is powerful for computer vision and deep learning tasks.
📊TensorFlow is designed for working with large datasets and offers better debugging capabilities. Keras works best with small datasets and requires less frequent debugging. PyTorch performs well with high-dimensional datasets and is relatively easy to debug.
🚀TensorFlow has excellent deployment options, including TensorFlow Serving for server deployment and mobile deployment. Keras can be deployed using TensorFlow Serving or Flask. PyTorch offers PyTorch Mobile for deployment on mobile devices.