Is Batman Irrelevant if He Can't Kill? | The Controversy Explained

TLDRDirector Zack Snyder believes that DC is making Batman irrelevant if he can't kill. While traditional comics and films show Batman choosing not to kill, Snyder argues that having him adhere to this rule limits the character's relevance. The controversy arises from Snyder's deconstructivist point of view and his belief that superheroes should not be held to unrealistic moral standards.

Key insights

😱The debate revolves around the concept of Batman's no-kill rule and whether it limits the character's depth and relevance.

🦇Snyder argues that having Batman adhere to the no-kill rule ignores the complexities and moral gray areas present in real-world situations.

🔪Fans of Batman disapprove of Snyder's approach, as they believe that Batman's refusal to kill is an essential part of his character and portrays his commitment to justice.

💥Proponents of Snyder's viewpoint argue that allowing Batman to kill adds depth to his character and explores the consequences and morality surrounding vigilantism.

🎥Snyder refers to his own films, such as 'Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice,' where Batman's lethal methods were controversial among fans.

Q&A

Why does Zack Snyder believe that DC is making Batman irrelevant?

—Snyder believes that Batman's adherence to the no-kill rule limits the character's depth and relevance, as it does not reflect the complexities and moral gray areas present in real-world situations.

Why do fans disagree with Zack Snyder's viewpoint on Batman?

—Fans believe that Batman's no-kill rule is an integral part of his character, representing his commitment to justice and distinguishing him from other superheroes.

What does Zack Snyder's argument mean for the future of Batman movies?

—Snyder's argument opens up possibilities for future Batman movies to explore the consequences and morality of vigilantism, including the idea of Batman breaking his own rules.

Were Snyder's controversial portrayals of Batman well-received?

—The controversial portrayals of Batman in films like 'Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice' received mixed reactions from fans, with some appreciating the darker and more morally complex portrayal, while others disapproved of Batman's lethal methods.

Is Batman's no-kill rule present in all Batman comics and movies?

—Yes, the no-kill rule is a consistent element of Batman's character in most comics and movies, emphasizing his commitment to justice and moral principles.

Timestamped Summary

00:02Director Zack Snyder believes that DC is making Batman irrelevant if he can't kill, sparking a debate about Batman's no-kill rule and its impact on his character.

01:55Snyder argues that Batman's adherence to the no-kill rule fails to reflect the complexities and moral gray areas present in real-world situations.

03:59Fans of Batman disagree with Snyder's viewpoint, as they believe that Batman's no-kill rule is integral to his character and reflects his commitment to justice.

07:46Snyder references his own films, such as 'Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice,' which received mixed reactions due to Batman's lethal methods.

Browse more