📂Approach 1: Divide code by type (Aggregates, Entities, Value Objects) in separate folders. Common, shared classes can be placed in a 'Common' folder. Provides a clear overview of code structure but lacks cohesion and may result in deeply nested folders.
📁Approach 2: Divide code by feature in separate folders (e.g., 'Menu', 'Guest', 'Host'). Each folder contains all related code (Entities, Value Objects, etc.) for a specific feature. Provides better cohesion and allows for easier refactoring and code reusability.
📝Creating proper folder structure and organizing code based on feature rather than type can improve code maintainability, readability, and scalability.
⚙️Implementing folder structure based on feature allows for easy navigation and understanding of the system. It also enables seamless refactoring by moving entire slices of logic to different folders or bounded contexts.
🔀Choosing the appropriate approach depends on the project's needs and requirements. Approach 1 may be suitable for smaller projects or teams with limited complexity, while Approach 2 is more beneficial in larger projects with multiple features and complex domain models.