How J.J. Abrams Ruined the Star Wars Sequel Trilogy

TLDRJ.J. Abrams' ambiguous storytelling and lack of on-screen character development in Episode VII set the stage for the disappointment in the Star Wars Sequel Trilogy. The decision to have Luke Skywalker disappear and turn him into a broken character off-screen created cognitive dissonance for the audience. The failure to show Luke's fall from grace and emotional journey from hero to zero undermined the entire trilogy. Abrams' reliance on mystery and suspense, a trademark of his storytelling style, didn't translate well into the self-contained world of Star Wars. The lack of an overarching storyline and collaboration between directors further contributed to the franchise's downfall.

Key insights

💔J.J. Abrams' ambiguous storytelling and lack of on-screen character development set the stage for disappointment in the Sequel Trilogy.

🧠The decision to have Luke Skywalker disappear and turn him into a broken character off-screen created cognitive dissonance for the audience.

🙏The failure to show Luke's fall from grace and emotional journey from hero to zero undermined the entire trilogy.

Abrams' reliance on mystery and suspense, a trademark of his storytelling style, didn't translate well into the self-contained world of Star Wars.

🙅‍♂️The lack of an overarching storyline and collaboration between directors further contributed to the franchise's downfall.

Q&A

What was the main problem with J.J. Abrams' storytelling in the Star Wars Sequel Trilogy?

The main problem was Abrams' ambiguous storytelling and lack of on-screen character development, particularly in Episode VII.

Why did Luke Skywalker's character disappoint the audience?

Luke's character was ruined due to J.J. Abrams' decision to have him disappear and become a broken character off-screen, which contradicted the hero we knew from the original trilogy.

How did J.J. Abrams' storytelling style clash with the Star Wars universe?

Abrams' reliance on mystery and suspense, a trademark of his storytelling style, didn't work well in the self-contained world of Star Wars, where fans expected a more cohesive and conclusive narrative.

Did the lack of collaboration between directors contribute to the downfall of the Sequel Trilogy?

Yes, the lack of an overarching storyline and collaboration between directors resulted in a disjointed narrative and inconsistency in character arcs, further contributing to the disappointment of the Sequel Trilogy.

What could have been done differently to improve the Sequel Trilogy?

Having a clear and cohesive overarching storyline, consistent character development, and more collaboration between directors could have improved the overall quality and reception of the Sequel Trilogy.

Timestamped Summary

00:00J.J. Abrams' ambiguous storytelling and lack of on-screen character development set the stage for disappointment in the Sequel Trilogy.

04:27The decision to have Luke Skywalker disappear and turn him into a broken character off-screen created cognitive dissonance for the audience.

08:22The failure to show Luke's fall from grace and emotional journey from hero to zero undermined the entire trilogy.

10:40Abrams' reliance on mystery and suspense, a trademark of his storytelling style, didn't translate well into the self-contained world of Star Wars.

11:27The lack of an overarching storyline and collaboration between directors further contributed to the franchise's downfall.