⚡️Go enables faster development for back-end and infrastructure projects.
🌐TypeScript is highly suited for web development.
🔧TypeScript's developer tooling, such as the Language Server Protocol, can be slow on large codebases.
⌛️Go's compilation time is significantly faster than TypeScript's, making it ideal for quick iteration and testing.
🧰TypeScript has a rich ecosystem and extensive libraries, making it easy to get started with and scale web projects.
Which language is better for back-end and infrastructure development?
—Go is better suited for back-end and infrastructure development due to its faster development speed and efficient runtime.
Which language is more suitable for web development?
—TypeScript is highly suitable for web development, providing better developer experience and extensive libraries for building scalable web applications.
Why is TypeScript's tooling slower on large projects?
—TypeScript's language server protocol (LSP) can struggle with large codebases, resulting in slower code analysis and autocompletion.
What advantage does Go have in terms of compilation time?
—Go's compilation time is significantly faster than TypeScript's, allowing for quick iteration and faster testing cycles.
Is TypeScript's ecosystem suitable for scaling web projects?
—Yes, TypeScript has a rich ecosystem with extensive libraries, making it easy to scale and maintain large web projects.
00:00Theo expresses his surprise at realizing the value of Go, despite previously disliking it.
00:14Theo acknowledges the benefits of Go in handling tasks like database management.
01:02Theo compares the developer velocity of TypeScript and Go, expressing his opinion that TypeScript is faster for web development.
02:37Theo discusses the runtime efficiency of Go and its faster compilation time.
04:32Theo mentions the challenges of TypeScript tooling on large projects and the potential slowdown of the language server protocol (LSP).
06:17Theo highlights the rich ecosystem and library support of TypeScript for web development.
