Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald - A Disappointing Sequel

TLDRIn the movie Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald, Newt Scamander, a magical creature expert, is pulled into a conflict between Grindelwald and the wizards. The movie suffers from inconsistent tone, unnecessary plot points, and unexplained plot developments.

Key insights

🎬The movie tries to explore the backstory of Grindelwald, a character briefly mentioned in the Harry Potter series.

🤔The plot becomes convoluted with unnecessary sideplots and characters.

🔮Some scenes feel out of place and disrupt the overall flow of the movie.

😢The emotional impact of certain character deaths is undermined by poor execution.

🚫The movie fails to provide satisfying explanations for plot developments and character arcs.

Q&A

Is this movie a worthy addition to the Harry Potter franchise?

Opinions vary, but many fans consider this movie to be a disappointment compared to the previous installments.

Can this movie be enjoyed without prior knowledge of Harry Potter?

While it is helpful to have some familiarity with the Harry Potter series, it is possible to follow the story of this movie as a standalone.

Are there any connections between this movie and the original Harry Potter series?

Yes, this movie expands on some elements of the Harry Potter universe and features several characters from the original series.

What are the major criticisms of this movie?

Some major criticisms include an inconsistent tone, unnecessary subplots, and underdeveloped characters.

Is there a post-credit scene?

No, there is no post-credit scene in this movie.

Timestamped Summary

00:45The movie opens with Grindelwald breaking out of wizard jail.

09:43Newt Scamander is in trouble with the Ministry of Magic for causing havoc in the previous movie.

10:55Ezra Miller's character, who was believed to be dead, is shown to have survived and no longer at risk of exploding.