Demystifying Message Receipts: Short Polling vs Long Polling

TLDRThis video explores two approaches for handling message receipts: short polling and long polling. Short polling involves periodically sending requests to check for new messages, while long polling keeps a connection open to receive immediate notifications. Long polling is less efficient and doesn't offer significant advantages over short polling.

Key insights

🔄Short polling involves periodically sending requests to check for new messages.

🌐Long polling keeps a connection open to receive immediate notifications.

Long polling has a higher latency compared to short polling.

⚡️Short polling is more efficient and suitable for most use cases.

💡Long polling may be used in scenarios where real-time notifications are critical.

Q&A

What is short polling?

Short polling involves periodically sending requests to check for new messages.

What is long polling?

Long polling keeps a connection open to receive immediate notifications.

Which approach is more efficient?

Short polling is more efficient than long polling.

When should I use long polling?

Long polling may be used in scenarios where real-time notifications are critical.

Which approach has lower latency?

Short polling has lower latency compared to long polling.

Timestamped Summary

00:00Introduction to short polling and long polling for message receipts

00:45Explanation of short polling: periodic request checks for new messages

02:15Explanation of long polling: keeping a connection open for immediate notifications

04:10Comparison of short polling and long polling efficiency

06:20Use cases for long polling