💥Three penalty decisions not given by referee Stuart Atwell.
🔎Analysis reveals potential bias in referee's decisions.
😡Club expresses dissatisfaction on social media.
🗣️Manager emphasizes the need for fair officiating.
🤔Club's response on social media raises questions about professionalism.
What were the three penalty decisions that were not given?
—The first two penalties were debatable, but the third decision was a clear foul on Hudson.
Was there any potential bias in the referee's decisions?
—Analysis of the decisions suggests potential bias in favor of the opposing team.
Why did the club express dissatisfaction on social media?
—The club believes that the three penalties not given had a significant impact on the outcome of the game.
What did the manager say about the referee's decisions?
—The manager emphasized the need for fair officiating and highlighted the poor decisions made by the referee.
What questions does the club's response on social media raise about professionalism?
—The club's quick-fire tweet and criticism of the referee's integrity raise questions about professionalism and sportsmanship.
00:00Forest's defeat highlights three penalty decisions not given.
05:40Analysis suggests potential bias in referee's decisions.
15:20Club expresses dissatisfaction on social media.
23:10Manager emphasizes the need for fair officiating.
30:50Club's response on social media raises questions about professionalism.
