🔝Manchester City's impressive performance without Harland suggests they are better without him.
⚡️Harland's runs in behind are brilliant, but he lacks involvement in build-up play.
🔄Pep prefers playing with players like Alvarez who can drop deep and contribute to the midfield.
🎯Manchester City's free-flowing and scoring style demonstrates their strength without Harland.
🔢City's goal difference puts scoreboard pressure on Arsenal in the title race.
Is Manchester City a better side without Harland?
—Based on their performances, it seems that Manchester City is a better side without Harland. They are scoring goals, playing a free-flowing style, and winning games.
Why does Pep prefer players like Alvarez over Harland?
—Pep prefers players like Alvarez because they can drop deep, contribute to the midfield, and make runs from wide positions. Harland's runs in behind are brilliant, but he lacks involvement in build-up play.
Does City's goal difference put pressure on Arsenal?
—Yes, City's goal difference puts scoreboard pressure on Arsenal in the title race. It narrows the gap between the two teams and adds an element of competition.
What is the style of play of Manchester City without Harland?
—Manchester City's style of play without Harland is free-flowing and focused on scoring goals. They have a strong attacking presence and demonstrate their strength as a team.
What category does this video belong to?
—This video belongs to the Sports category.
00:00The video discusses whether Manchester City is better without Harland.
00:13Manchester City is currently performing well and considered a better side without Harland.
01:03Pep prefers players like Alvarez who can contribute to the midfield and make runs from wide positions.
01:23Harland's runs in behind are brilliant, but he lacks involvement in build-up play.
03:19City's goal difference puts scoreboard pressure on Arsenal in the title race.
