Apple's Compliance with EU Regulations: Malicious or Misunderstood?

TLDRApple is being accused of malicious compliance with the EU's digital markets act, but claims to be protecting user privacy and security. They are reducing fees, but adding a core technology fee. Developers have raised concerns about the impact on their revenue. Critics argue that Apple's behavior is anti-competitive.

Key insights

🍎Apple accused of malicious compliance with EU regulations

💰Apple reduces fees, but adds a new core technology fee

🔒Developers concerned about the impact on their revenue

🔄Apple's behavior seen as anti-competitive

📱Apple maintains monopolistic behavior

Q&A

What is the EU accusing Apple of?

—The EU accuses Apple of malicious compliance with the digital markets act, which regulates app stores and payment systems.

How is Apple responding to the EU's regulations?

—Apple claims to be protecting user privacy and security, but is reducing fees for subscriptions and digital goods while adding a new core technology fee.

Why are developers concerned about the changes?

—Developers are concerned about the impact on their revenue, as Apple could take up to 60% of their yearly revenue under certain circumstances.

Is Apple's behavior considered anti-competitive?

—Critics argue that Apple's behavior is anti-competitive, as they maintain a monopolistic position and restrict the use of third-party marketplaces and payment systems.

How does Apple's compliance with the EU regulations affect users outside the EU?

—Apple will continue its monopolistic behavior outside the EU, affecting users worldwide.