🔍United's dominance in extra time was due to a tactical change in their defensive shape.
⚡️The aggressive press and higher risk tactic made United's press more effective.
🎯Amad's goal was the result of smart positioning and a perfect finish.
🔄Ten Hog's tactical change forced Liverpool into long, low probability balls.
🔄United's counter-pressing strategy disrupted Liverpool's possession game.
What led to United's dominance in extra time?
—United's dominance in extra time was a result of a tactical change in their defensive shape, which led to a more effective press and limited opportunities for Liverpool.
How did Amad score the winning goal?
—Amad's goal was the result of smart positioning and a perfect finish. He recognized the opportunity and used a clever feint to create space for his shot.
How did Liverpool respond to United's tactical change?
—Liverpool struggled to break through United's aggressive press and were forced into long, low probability balls.
What impact did counter-pressing have on the game?
—United's counter-pressing strategy disrupted Liverpool's possession game and limited their ability to establish control.
Was United's tactical change a risky move?
—Yes, United's tactical change involved higher risk, but it paid off with a more effective press and ultimately the winning goal.
00:00Gacho's pass into Ahmad wasn't far enough in front of him, but Ahmad's next move was underrated and crucial.
00:32Ten Hog made a tactical change in extra time that led to United's dominance.
07:12Amad's defensive action led to the winning goal.
07:26United's aggressive press disrupted Liverpool's possession game.
08:48Bradley's positioning allowed Amad to create space and score the winning goal.
09:11United's tactical change forced Liverpool into long, low probability balls.
09:59United's counter-pressing strategy disrupted Liverpool's possession game.
10:13Amad's goal was the result of smart positioning and a perfect finish.
